October 22, 2006

Folksonomies and rich serendipity

Patrick Lambe has provided a simple model on the use of folksonomies. To quote:

What makes folksonomic tagging activity different from "free text" keywords entered into optional metadata fields by publishers of content into content management systems? Why does the serendipity afforded by such (user contributed) keywords seem less powerful than folksonomic tagging? The answer lies in people as knowledge aggregators.

Posted by jamesr on October 22, 2006 10:44 AM
Categories: Information architecture

Back to Main Page...

	Area Health Service project(13)
	Book & product reviews(15)
	Conferences & presentations(101)
	Content management(441)
	Design & usability guidelines(27)
	Document & records management(7)
	E-learning(24)
	Information architecture(358)
	Information management(28)
	Interface design(33)
	Intranets(335)
	James' articles(85)
	Knowledge management(403)
	Metrics & ROI(33)
	Search tools(65)
	Usability & user-centered design(404)
	Web development(71)
	Weblogs(54)
	XML(95)

SYNDICATE

	October 2006
	September 2006
	August 2006
	July 2006
	June 2006
	May 2006
	April 2006
	March 2006
	February 2006
	January 2006
	December 2005
	November 2005
	October 2005
	September 2005
	August 2005
	July 2005
	June 2005
	May 2005
	April 2005
	March 2005
	February 2005
	January 2005
	December 2004
	November 2004
	October 2004
	September 2004
	August 2004
	July 2004
	June 2004
	May 2004
	April 2004
	March 2004
	February 2004
	January 2004
	December 2003
	November 2003
	October 2003
	September 2003
	August 2003
	July 2003
	June 2003
	May 2003
	April 2003
	March 2003
	February 2003
	January 2003
	December 2002
	November 2002
	October 2002
	September 2002
	August 2002
	July 2002
	June 2002