Group working at an office desk from Shutterstock
Intranet team sizes, skills and capacity vary around the world. At a media company, one experienced intranet manager runs a very successful intranet, with a small amount of assistance from IT. At a major government department with 12 people in the team, the result is a fairly status quo intranet. So what is the optimal team size to ensure a useful and evolving intranet?
This article outlines the key resourcing requirements for successful intranet teams. In most cases intranet resources are made up of a core team working in conjunction with other areas of the organisation. The core team is responsible for a holistic view of the intranet and the other areas contribute specific expertise.
To establish the right mix of resources across the organisation, some basic assumptions need to be established. For example, a typical set of parameters might include:
- a decentralized content model is in place and a limited amount of content is authored by the core team
- technology changes are undertaken by the web team on a cost and materials basis
- incremental improvements to the intranet are managed and resourced by the intranet team
- graphic design is sourced externally
The resourcing required for an intranet team is also strongly affected by how easy it is to publish and share content. The existing technology (or lack off) often dictates the essential components of the core intranet team, IT resources and author numbers.
The size of an intranet team changes as capability grows
Core intranet team responsibilities
The first responsibility of an intranet team is to have a strategic vision for the intranet. This vision will constantly evolve and will generally be based on the organisation’s current drivers and on innovations in the emerging field of intranets.
Achieving the vision requires the core team to deliver a framework to operate within. This can include a range of aspects, such as:
- having an effective governance model
- gathering and responding to staff feedback
- identifying business needs
- managing change
- managing stakeholders
- empowering the author community
- sharing intranet success stories
Beyond these essentials, the core team will influence and work with other areas across the organisation to:
- design and implement improvements
- manage content
- manage communications
- refine technology
Whether the organisation has 100 staff or 100,000, this overall focus is essential and generally requires at least one person in most organisations. The team size may then grow, depending on how many operational duties are allocated to the core team.
More details on success factors for the core team are included in an earlier article What do successful intranet managers have in common?
Nowadays the intranet is rarely viewed in isolation and other tools such as collaboration and document management systems provide enormous opportunities for staff. As the digital workplace emerges, a successful core intranet team also needs to be familiar with all of the information systems used by staff. This will have an impact on skill sets and team sizes.
One person alone cannot have all the required skills
Where does the intranet team fit into the organisation?
Intranet teams sit in IT, communications, marketing and many other different areas. At this stage in the evolution of intranets there is not an established area where the intranet team ‘belongs’.
As the intranet involves staff throughout the organisation, the best fit is where the team can:
- easily gain access to staff across the organisation
- have a committed and engaged sponsor with an overall view of the organisation
- secure sufficient dedicated resources
- control appropriate discretionary spend
Many intranet teams are also responsible for their organisations’ websites. This is often a legacy of using similar back end technologies or a logical alignment of skill sets. In reality this means the intranet is often the poor cousin and managed on a ‘business as usual’ basis at best. The most successful intranet teams have separate identities and are not restricted by competing with websites for attention and effort.
We also often see intranets becoming victims of their own success, resulting in their being poached and moved to other areas. This is not a problem if the underlying points above are addressed, and such change may be part of the natural evolution of intranets.
Big projects vs incremental improvements
The next key factor in team size is determining whether the team is able to make incremental ongoing improvements or if the intranet is restricted to project funding.
Many organisations approve major projects to implement new technology and/or design and migrate content. At launch the intranet is shiny and new and all is well. Then with no ongoing resources or attention the intranet falls into disrepair and a few years down the track the big intranet redesign project is launched again. Many organisations have followed this expensive model over the last ten years.
It’s similar to laying out new beds in the garden, with everyone excited to do the project, buying all the edges and plants, digging holes and planting and very pleased when it all looks great when you are finished. Then organisations expect it to be functional and perfect for the next 20 years without any weeding, watering or pruning. It’s no wonder it becomes a weedy mess.
More on this is discussed in an earlier article How to make this your last big redesign.
A more sustainable way to manage the intranet is to have the resources within the team to continuously deliver incremental improvements. Having sufficient resources means there is at least one person with the aptitude for research, and the ability to design and deliver. The starting point for most organisations is one business analyst position.
Content management is one of the key determiners for size
Managing intranet content
Content remains one of the most time-intensive ongoing tasks of any intranet.
There are five basic models:
- Fully centralised publishing. All content is published by the central intranet team, with business areas contributing information via email, Word documents and other source documents.
- Decentralised publishing. Business are as responsible for publishing and managing their own content. Authors in each business area can publish directly to the intranet.
- Publishing with review. Content is produced by authors within business areas, but goes through some form of review before it is published to the intranet, such as being checked by a manager or being reviewed by the central team.
- Federated publishing. A hybrid model is followed, with each business area appointing a coordinator who takes responsibility for managing intranet authors within their area. This devolves the review process to each business area.
- End-user content contribution. Staff across the organisation can contribute news items or content to the site directly, without having a formal role as an ‘author’. This could involve allowing staff to directly publish news items or calendar events, or the use of wikis and blogs.
Refer to our earlier article on Five intranet publishing models.
Fully centralised publishing will require the most resources. We have seen intranet teams ranging from three to 12 people using this model. At the opposite end of the spectrum, where everyone is an author, the numbers needed in a core team are minimised.
More authors mean more core team support will be needed
The most common model we see is federated publishing, where the home page and key landing pages are managed by the core intranet team and the rest of the content is managed throughout the organisation. This model usually needs one to two people in the core team, with skills in writing, publishing and ideally graphics. In this model, the core team staff supporting content also have an important role in empowering the author community.
Supporting and empowering publishers after the implementation of a new CMS can be a full-time role, but as the system is embedded and self-help modules are developed the burden of supporting publishers is lessened. Where distributed publishing exists, all efforts put into making publishers self-sustaining will free up time in the core team.
As a rule of thumb, if you have more than 100 active authors, an average CMS and basic instructions, a dedicated full-time support person will be required.
Refer to our earlier article How to empower authors.
Some organisations are achieving success with a newer model where common tasks across the organisation are written and maintained by the core team. This has seen significant improvement in the quality of intranet content and generally equates to one full-time writer.
IT resources are an essential part of successful intranets
Relations with IT
All intranet resources are impacted by the available technology. An easy-to-use CMS will minimise publishing queries. Those organisations with no CMS generally have larger core teams with specialised skills. Most organisations sit between these two extremes and have one or two technical IT staff supporting the intranet on a part-time basis.
Even if the core intranet team is based in IT, the developers can still be in another team or external, not within the core team.
The technical support required will be unique for each intranet. Some core intranet teams sit within IT and have easier access to IT resources, others do not. Defining responsibilities and sharing capabilities between the core intranet team and IT is often a delicate dance. The key is to ensure that the level of technical support is appropriate for your intranet. This may mean that IT capabilities are also sourced from external vendors, adding another level of complexity to the mix.
Some of the key success factors in working with separate IT teams are:
- relationship building
- having enough technical knowledge to ask the right questions
- clear escalation paths for issues
- realistic service level agreements
- access to development skills, both ad hoc and for projects
- vendor relationships and agreements
Time and time again, core intranet teams that include an experienced developer are able to progress the intranet much more quickly and easily than teams that need to engage IT developers.
The benefits of having a developer in the core team are ten-fold. Their focus and reason for being is all about the intranet.
Size isn’t everything
One of the best intranet teams we’ve ever worked with had three people in the core team.
One person focused on the overall running of the intranet and building relationships throughout the organisation. The second team member’s responsibilities centred on managing high level content, training and nurturing the content community and resolving technical CMS issues. The third team member had an analytical and curious mind and focused on designing improvements and working with the two IT developers to implement these.
This team was well supported by four to five site owners, about 200 authors, a responsive, skilled IT team and a budget. It was a great example of how the core responsibilities of an intranet team can be covered by a highly skilled and focused small team.
|Type of organisation||Role of core team||Key relationships||Publishing model|
|Retail global multi national with 20,000 staff around the globe||Manages technology, governance, standards and global site.|
Focuses on enabling other countries to improve intranet.
|Communications teams in most countries who manage the local information.|
Local country teams enforce governance and manage content creators. Focusing on local information, skills set mainly editorial and writing.
2-6 people per local country team.
3.5 internal IT staff and 2 external IT resources.
Global CMS with standard templates.
Approximately 500 active authors.
|Government department centred in capital city with satellite offices covering about 3,000 staff||Design, publishing, project work and strategic planning.|
An overall team of 8 is responsible for website and intranet. About 40% of effort is for intranet.
Authors in Human Resources.
2 part time in HR.
Internally developed system. Authoring content requires technical expertise.
|Privately owned organisation with 1,000 staff||Design, managing content authors, training and stakeholder management.|
|Authors for publishing content.|
Technical support by IT.
2 IT resources when required.
Standard content management system. Good resources to support authors.
|Manufacturing organisation with 3 key locations and about 10,000 staff.||Manages and makes ongoing improvements of intranet. Design, develop and implement improvements. Top level content managed by team (one writer, with some graphic skills)|
|Content champions at key locations and in major business areas such as Finance.|
Broader IT team for administration and overall technology direction.
2 part time IT staff
Well known content management system, implemented 3 years ago. Integrates well with internal document management system.
|Insurance company with 5,000 staff including an overseas based call centre||Constantly evolves intranet to build more activity tasks and create a single platform for staff.|
In house developer.
|IT to implement activity tasks. Authors take an active role in managing their area of the intranet.|
1-3 per business area
Mature CMS with good support for authors however author base changes on a regular basis. Over 300 active authors.
Intranet teams vary in size, but the core team needs to have the skills to deliver and the capacity to influence all the related parties across the organisation. Intranets do not run on thin air.
There are no magic answers about what size your intranet team should be however achieving a useful and usable intranet takes time, effort and resources. A good core intranet team is able to focus on delivering visible improvements and improving the intranet behind the scenes at the same time.
At least one dedicated person is needed in most organisation, the rest of the resources will depend on the variables outlined in the article. The intranet team will change overtime as the capability of the intranet is realised and the operational tasks are minimised.
Adequately resourced intranets drive efficiency gains in any organisation. Whereas, inadequately resourced intranets lead to increased hidden costs, especially where staff maintain the intranet below the radar.