<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Step Two Designs &#187; usability testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/tag/usability-testing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au</link>
	<description>Beyond The Idea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tree testing for effective navigation</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_treetesting/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_treetesting/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Byrne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intranets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability & information architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[navigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-centred design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=4728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tree testing provides a cheap and effective way of checking draft navigation before proceeding further into a redesign.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_treetesting/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some testing is better than none</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_testing/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_testing/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca Rodgers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intranets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability & information architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=3117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even when time and resources are tight, it is always worth squeezing in at least a little user testing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_testing/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evaluating Caloundra City Council&#8217;s EDMS classification</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_caloundracouncil/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_caloundracouncil/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2004 07:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Robertson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[document & records management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classification schemes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[records management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This case study describes the use of usability techniques to evaluate the the Keywords for Councils classification for Caloundra City Council's document management system (EDMS).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_caloundracouncil/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five ways to identify intranet usability issues</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_usabilityintranet/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_usabilityintranet/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Donna Spencer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intranets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability & information architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article provides five techniques to identify likely usability problems in your intranet. Some techniques provide indications about where the main problems lie, others provide concrete evidence.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_usabilityintranet/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

