<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Centralised or decentralised authoring?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_decentralised/index.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_decentralised/index.html</link>
	<description>Beyond The Idea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NWwaterboy</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_decentralised/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-3452</link>
		<dc:creator>NWwaterboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=445#comment-3452</guid>
		<description>I believe you need to also keep the overall nature/structure of the organization in mind. The design of the CMS needs to adapt to this, if it is going to be adopted successfully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you need to also keep the overall nature/structure of the organization in mind. The design of the CMS needs to adapt to this, if it is going to be adopted successfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_decentralised/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-2772</link>
		<dc:creator>James Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=445#comment-2772</guid>
		<description>Fully centralised publishing is simply a bottleneck, so not a viable option in any larger organisation.

I think the key concept is this: &quot;not all content needs to be of equal quality&quot;. For important content, manage it tightly, or centralise it. For less important content, apply looser standards and decentralise it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully centralised publishing is simply a bottleneck, so not a viable option in any larger organisation.</p>
<p>I think the key concept is this: &#8220;not all content needs to be of equal quality&#8221;. For important content, manage it tightly, or centralise it. For less important content, apply looser standards and decentralise it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_decentralised/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-2765</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=445#comment-2765</guid>
		<description>&#039;The easier it is to publish content to the intranet, the harder it is for users to find it&#039;

This is so true - most intranets are planned at the top levels, but decentralised publishing means that the lower levels quickly become a mish mash of whatever is &#039;urgent&#039; at the time. Lack of dedicated resources in the business areas and lack of handover means that instead of updates, new pages are often created where they&#039;re not needed.

The idea of bringing decentralised publishing to an internet is simply terrifying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;The easier it is to publish content to the intranet, the harder it is for users to find it&#8217;</p>
<p>This is so true &#8211; most intranets are planned at the top levels, but decentralised publishing means that the lower levels quickly become a mish mash of whatever is &#8216;urgent&#8217; at the time. Lack of dedicated resources in the business areas and lack of handover means that instead of updates, new pages are often created where they&#8217;re not needed.</p>
<p>The idea of bringing decentralised publishing to an internet is simply terrifying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cris</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_decentralised/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>Cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=445#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more with you James. Also Hannah you are quite right; little has been formally written. I have been asked to organise decentralisation for both internet and intranet. I worry about the dropping standards when involving the internet as has been witnessed on the intranet.

James great post - as usual. BTW the new intranet book is well writtent and offers good advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more with you James. Also Hannah you are quite right; little has been formally written. I have been asked to organise decentralisation for both internet and intranet. I worry about the dropping standards when involving the internet as has been witnessed on the intranet.</p>
<p>James great post &#8211; as usual. BTW the new intranet book is well writtent and offers good advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_decentralised/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=445#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m not searching hard enough but I&#039;m surprised at how little info there is on this topic out there. From my experience it is one of the most debated hot topics of all!
Senior managers always want decentralisation, and web teams want centralisation.
Info about comparative costs and stories about other organisation&#039;s experiences with these 2 models would be really interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m not searching hard enough but I&#8217;m surprised at how little info there is on this topic out there. From my experience it is one of the most debated hot topics of all!<br />
Senior managers always want decentralisation, and web teams want centralisation.<br />
Info about comparative costs and stories about other organisation&#8217;s experiences with these 2 models would be really interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

