Comments on: Custom code, CMS and portals http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_customcode/index.html Beyond The Idea Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:46:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Graham Tritt http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_customcode/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-746 Graham Tritt Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:13:50 +0000 http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=1729#comment-746 Really great article. Clear and comprehensive. Thanks. Tomorrow I am rejoining an internet and CMS support group after 2 years in web application development. Also I have several projects in mind for clubs with social networking. So I needed to review the pros and cons. Best wishes, Graham Really great article. Clear and comprehensive. Thanks. Tomorrow I am rejoining an internet and CMS support group after 2 years in web application development. Also I have several projects in mind for clubs with social networking. So I needed to review the pros and cons. Best wishes, Graham

]]> By: Carol http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_customcode/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-726 Carol Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:44:21 +0000 http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=1729#comment-726 Hi James. Thanks for the well-written article. IMO, your #2 "Delivering through the CMS or portal" is the best option. If the portal / CMS you're using is robust enough, I think many of the disadvantages you mentioned are eliminated. The early portion of PortalApp [http://demo.portalapp.net] development was API oriented, making the product flexible and open. Hi James. Thanks for the well-written article. IMO, your #2 “Delivering through the CMS or portal” is the best option. If the portal / CMS you’re using is robust enough, I think many of the disadvantages you mentioned are eliminated.

The early portion of PortalApp [http://demo.portalapp.net] development was API oriented, making the product flexible and open.

]]>