<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Knowledge sharing&#8217; should be avoided</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_knowledgesharing/index.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_knowledgesharing/index.html</link>
	<description>Beyond The Idea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_knowledgesharing/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 07:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=189#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>Senior management love everyone knowing everything because if someone goes on holiday, or leaves for any other reason, it is merely a resource leaving - not knowledge. Anyone is expendable at anytime. Its like cloud computing; if one node drops out, the others simply do slightly more work to make up for the loss.

The individual doesn’t like being expendable and also feels less sense of accomplishment and ownership in the project. In my company (which practices knowledge sharing aggressively), I am moved around daily, develop in 5 different languages, and feel more like a resource than an expert.

Maybe its not all bad for the individual though. My skill set is larger than it would be if I had stuck to server-side Java development. Larger skill sets make you more hireable - which I suppose is lucky because you are also more expendable :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senior management love everyone knowing everything because if someone goes on holiday, or leaves for any other reason, it is merely a resource leaving &#8211; not knowledge. Anyone is expendable at anytime. Its like cloud computing; if one node drops out, the others simply do slightly more work to make up for the loss.</p>
<p>The individual doesn’t like being expendable and also feels less sense of accomplishment and ownership in the project. In my company (which practices knowledge sharing aggressively), I am moved around daily, develop in 5 different languages, and feel more like a resource than an expert.</p>
<p>Maybe its not all bad for the individual though. My skill set is larger than it would be if I had stuck to server-side Java development. Larger skill sets make you more hireable &#8211; which I suppose is lucky because you are also more expendable :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links for 06-04-09 &#124; burningCat</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_knowledgesharing/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for 06-04-09 &#124; burningCat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=189#comment-754</guid>
		<description>[...] ‘Knowledge sharing’ should be avoided » Step Two Designs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ‘Knowledge sharing’ should be avoided » Step Two Designs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To Share or not to Share &#171; K-Center SBM ITB</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_knowledgesharing/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>To Share or not to Share &#171; K-Center SBM ITB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 06:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=189#comment-608</guid>
		<description>[...] Share or not to&#160;Share By ismailsbm  It is interesting to read this article written by James Robertson entitled &#8220;&#8216;knowledge sharing&#8217; shoud be avoided&#8221;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Share or not to&nbsp;Share By ismailsbm  It is interesting to read this article written by James Robertson entitled &#8220;&#8216;knowledge sharing&#8217; shoud be avoided&#8221;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_knowledgesharing/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=189#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Today at KM Singapore this idea seemed to hit a tipping point. Everyone was saying the same thing. 

You said it first &#039;it is recommended that ‘knowledge sharing’ not be discussed beyond the confines of the KM team&#039;, and I&#039;ve been banging on about it ever since. It&#039;s funny how it takes a while for ideas to gain currency. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today at KM Singapore this idea seemed to hit a tipping point. Everyone was saying the same thing. </p>
<p>You said it first &#8216;it is recommended that ‘knowledge sharing’ not be discussed beyond the confines of the KM team&#8217;, and I&#8217;ve been banging on about it ever since. It&#8217;s funny how it takes a while for ideas to gain currency. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KM Singapore - e-wot?</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_knowledgesharing/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>KM Singapore - e-wot?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=189#comment-283</guid>
		<description>[...] James Robertson owes credit for being the first to articulate this idea, here&#039;s his post in Column Two that made me slap my forehead and go &#039;yes, that&#039;s it&#039;. It&#039;s from 2004, so it&#039;s not a new idea at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Robertson owes credit for being the first to articulate this idea, here&#8217;s his post in Column Two that made me slap my forehead and go &#8216;yes, that&#8217;s it&#8217;. It&#8217;s from 2004, so it&#8217;s not a new idea at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
