<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not all content needs to be of equal quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_contentquality/index.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_contentquality/index.html</link>
	<description>Beyond The Idea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ensuring good content &#171; i+j=k</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_contentquality/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Ensuring good content &#171; i+j=k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=122#comment-642</guid>
		<description>[...] article by StepTwo explores this a little further and suggests that a more relaxed approach to content [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article by StepTwo explores this a little further and suggests that a more relaxed approach to content [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Weekly links roundup&#160;by&#160;Communications from DMN</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_contentquality/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Weekly links roundup&#160;by&#160;Communications from DMN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=122#comment-385</guid>
		<description>[...] Does all of your content need to be of equal quality? Maybe not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Does all of your content need to be of equal quality? Maybe not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_contentquality/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>James Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=122#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Hi David, totally agree that we need to be more strategic on where we focus our writing efforts! The most important content isn&#039;t necessarily the most visible or most politically important...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, totally agree that we need to be more strategic on where we focus our writing efforts! The most important content isn&#8217;t necessarily the most visible or most politically important&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hamill</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cmb_contentquality/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hamill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=122#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Firstly, I totally agree. The attempt to cross-check every little piece of content is impossible. It also makes publishing on the intranet a bureaucratic nightmare. 

However in my view the content that deserves the proper attention is often overlooked for communications initiatives that few people care about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, I totally agree. The attempt to cross-check every little piece of content is impossible. It also makes publishing on the intranet a bureaucratic nightmare. </p>
<p>However in my view the content that deserves the proper attention is often overlooked for communications initiatives that few people care about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
