<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photos in staff directories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cb_directoryphotos/index.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cb_directoryphotos/index.html</link>
	<description>Beyond The Idea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:46:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cb_directoryphotos/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-1205</link>
		<dc:creator>James Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=3323#comment-1205</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s about having social and peer pressure on the right side of things. By this I mean:

If you have &quot;opt-in&quot;, then few people will want to be the ones that stand out, and photos don&#039;t take off.

Instead, if you put up photos by default (from the security passes, etc) and offer an &quot;opt-out&quot;, then peer pressure will discourage people from being amongst the few who don&#039;t have a photo.

It is worth having a photo, so it&#039;s worth getting the process right from the outset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s about having social and peer pressure on the right side of things. By this I mean:</p>
<p>If you have &#8220;opt-in&#8221;, then few people will want to be the ones that stand out, and photos don&#8217;t take off.</p>
<p>Instead, if you put up photos by default (from the security passes, etc) and offer an &#8220;opt-out&#8221;, then peer pressure will discourage people from being amongst the few who don&#8217;t have a photo.</p>
<p>It is worth having a photo, so it&#8217;s worth getting the process right from the outset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cb_directoryphotos/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=3323#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>&quot;...you work for us, we as an organisation are well within our rights to posses and use images of yourself for any responsible and legal purpose.&quot;

Wow.  I&#039;m glad I don&#039;t work for your company.

Giving the option of opting out is a very nice feature, and says a lot about your culture even if you encourage employees not to take advantage of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;you work for us, we as an organisation are well within our rights to posses and use images of yourself for any responsible and legal purpose.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wow.  I&#8217;m glad I don&#8217;t work for your company.</p>
<p>Giving the option of opting out is a very nice feature, and says a lot about your culture even if you encourage employees not to take advantage of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hobbs</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cb_directoryphotos/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hobbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=3323#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>Except for very small organizations, I agree that photos for intranet staff directories are a must.  Preparing for an upcoming meeting with people you haven&#039;t met yet is probably the biggest reason in my opinion.  Also, especially for very large organizations, you may have multiple people with similar names (even in the same building) so the photo can help make sure you&#039;re communicating with the right person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except for very small organizations, I agree that photos for intranet staff directories are a must.  Preparing for an upcoming meeting with people you haven&#8217;t met yet is probably the biggest reason in my opinion.  Also, especially for very large organizations, you may have multiple people with similar names (even in the same building) so the photo can help make sure you&#8217;re communicating with the right person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cb_directoryphotos/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-1192</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=3323#comment-1192</guid>
		<description>I concur with Andrew. I&#039;ve always taken the line with our staff that as you work for us, we as an organisation are well within our rights to posses and use images of yourself for any responsible and legal purpose.

Issues of vanity, legality or privacy are a moot point. 

We have also employed the ID pass capture method. As photos are supplied for use on authority or identification cards, these are uploaded to the directory. Photos are identified by the users unique network login, the simplest and most common identification method outside of an employee ID within an organisation.

In terms of clear guidelines - there&#039;s no need to reinvent the wheel here. Just grab a copy of the Passports Australia guidelines for photos (https://www.passports.gov.au/Web/requirements/Photos.aspx), and you&#039;re set.

Additionally, we put the responsibility for the photo back on the staff. If we&#039;ve sourced a photo from another location (say ID card production) and they don&#039;t like the photo, then the onus is on them to supply a suitable replacement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with Andrew. I&#8217;ve always taken the line with our staff that as you work for us, we as an organisation are well within our rights to posses and use images of yourself for any responsible and legal purpose.</p>
<p>Issues of vanity, legality or privacy are a moot point. </p>
<p>We have also employed the ID pass capture method. As photos are supplied for use on authority or identification cards, these are uploaded to the directory. Photos are identified by the users unique network login, the simplest and most common identification method outside of an employee ID within an organisation.</p>
<p>In terms of clear guidelines &#8211; there&#8217;s no need to reinvent the wheel here. Just grab a copy of the Passports Australia guidelines for photos (<a href="https://www.passports.gov.au/Web/requirements/Photos.aspx" rel="nofollow">https://www.passports.gov.au/Web/requirements/Photos.aspx</a>), and you&#8217;re set.</p>
<p>Additionally, we put the responsibility for the photo back on the staff. If we&#8217;ve sourced a photo from another location (say ID card production) and they don&#8217;t like the photo, then the onus is on them to supply a suitable replacement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/cb_directoryphotos/index.html/comment-page-1#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/?p=3323#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>IMHO photos are a must. I even disagree with the &quot;opt out&quot; option. It needs to become an accepted part of the culture that everyone gets their photo included because it is so valuable for the business and social connections. Our informal policy is that anyone can get their photo re-taken at any time and this addresses vanity issues.

I also believe that consistency is important. (E.g., B&amp;W, head and top of shoulders, same background, same half profile). Many of our staff photos are also used for external marketing and so they are consistent but it is difficult with the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO photos are a must. I even disagree with the &#8220;opt out&#8221; option. It needs to become an accepted part of the culture that everyone gets their photo included because it is so valuable for the business and social connections. Our informal policy is that anyone can get their photo re-taken at any time and this addresses vanity issues.</p>
<p>I also believe that consistency is important. (E.g., B&amp;W, head and top of shoulders, same background, same half profile). Many of our staff photos are also used for external marketing and so they are consistent but it is difficult with the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

