<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Column Two &#187; eye tracking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/tag/eye-tracking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo</link>
	<description>News and opinion on all things intranet &#38; CM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Eyetracking: is it worth it?</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/eyetracking-is-it-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/eyetracking-is-it-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Robertson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Usability & user-centered design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye tracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/?p=3837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Ross has written an article looking at eyetracking. To quote: It is easy to get excited about eyetracking. Seeing where people look while using your Web site, Web application, or software product sounds like an opportunity to get amazing insights into their user experience. But eyetracking is expensive and requires extra effort and specialized [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Jim Ross</b> has written an article looking at <a href="http://new.uxmatters.com/mt/archives/2009/10/eyetracking-is-it-worth-it.php">eyetracking</a>. To quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is easy to get excited about eyetracking. Seeing where people look while using your Web site, Web application, or software product sounds like an opportunity to get amazing insights into their user experience. But eyetracking is expensive and requires extra effort and specialized knowledge. The heat maps and other visualizations certainly look impressive, but what can you really learn from them? After using eyetracking for the first time, many find that it is not easy to know how to analyze the visualizations and make conclusions from them. Does eyetracking really provide any additional insights you would not have discovered anyway through traditional usability testing? Does the value of eyetracking outweigh its limitations? This article will discuss and answer these questions.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/eyetracking-is-it-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google details results of eye tracking study</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/google-details-results-of-eye-tracking-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/google-details-results-of-eye-tracking-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 20:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Robertson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability & user-centered design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/?p=3323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ReadWriteWeb reports on the results of a Google eye tracking study into search. To quote: Google posted an update about its eye tracking usability studies today. Most of the results are not exactly groundbreaking. It is, for example, no surprise that most users only scan the first couple of search results. Indeed, most Google users [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>ReadWriteWeb</b> reports on the results of a <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_eye-tracking.php">Google eye tracking study</a> into search. To quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Google posted an update about its eye tracking usability studies today. Most of the results are not exactly groundbreaking. It is, for example, no surprise that most users only scan the first couple of search results. Indeed, most Google users don&#8217;t seem to scan much further than the second result. There are, however, some interesting nuggets of information in this post about how Google uses this data to study every aspect of its search results page.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/google-details-results-of-eye-tracking-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

