<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building a CMS from scratch is so 1990s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/building-a-cms-from-scratch-is-so-1990s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/building-a-cms-from-scratch-is-so-1990s/</link>
	<description>News and opinion on all things intranet &#38; CM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 04:15:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Thomler</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/building-a-cms-from-scratch-is-so-1990s/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Thomler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/?p=3150#comment-474</guid>
		<description>As all organisations believe they are unique and special (like all people), it&#039;s no surprise to me that some organisations still take this route.

I&#039;ve also seen (and experienced) situations where a CMS is built unintentionally by stealth - where no CMS exists but people have updating needs, so little bits of a CMS are built one by one until it is rolled into a single system by ICT.

More interesting to me is whether organisations are writing extensions to existing CMSes - and how many share them with other organisations via marketplaces or where there is no direct competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As all organisations believe they are unique and special (like all people), it&#8217;s no surprise to me that some organisations still take this route.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also seen (and experienced) situations where a CMS is built unintentionally by stealth &#8211; where no CMS exists but people have updating needs, so little bits of a CMS are built one by one until it is rolled into a single system by ICT.</p>
<p>More interesting to me is whether organisations are writing extensions to existing CMSes &#8211; and how many share them with other organisations via marketplaces or where there is no direct competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/building-a-cms-from-scratch-is-so-1990s/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>James Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/?p=3150#comment-473</guid>
		<description>An all too common story.

Still, I think there are two different situations:

* Common website needs, which should be met by an out-of-the-box CMS (either closed or open source).

* Unique needs, which will require custom development, up to and including the creation of an entirely custom CMS.

It&#039;s the grey area between these two situations which cause so much difficulty...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An all too common story.</p>
<p>Still, I think there are two different situations:</p>
<p>* Common website needs, which should be met by an out-of-the-box CMS (either closed or open source).</p>
<p>* Unique needs, which will require custom development, up to and including the creation of an entirely custom CMS.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the grey area between these two situations which cause so much difficulty&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian F</title>
		<link>http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/building-a-cms-from-scratch-is-so-1990s/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steptwo.com.au/columntwo/?p=3150#comment-470</guid>
		<description>We did and I wouldn&#039;t. It was a very expensive way to get an underpowered site. A manager made that decision after a nice dinner with some enthusiastic programmers, it pretty much cost her her job, and it still hasn&#039;t delivered the desired functionality. That company is basically waiting a polite amount of time before telling their board it was a waste of a lot of money and replacing it with something a lot cheaper and better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We did and I wouldn&#8217;t. It was a very expensive way to get an underpowered site. A manager made that decision after a nice dinner with some enthusiastic programmers, it pretty much cost her her job, and it still hasn&#8217;t delivered the desired functionality. That company is basically waiting a polite amount of time before telling their board it was a waste of a lot of money and replacing it with something a lot cheaper and better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

